From the category archives:

Health

From the moment you so much as consider owning a horse, a series of ethical dilemmas ensue unrelentingly until the horse dies.

There follow a few dilemmas for you to consider…

  • The horse’s need for company
  • Rider needs vs horse’s needs – competition
  • Time
  • Breeding & unwanted horses
  • Training method & coach selection
  • Gear selection & use
  • Horse choice

Lameness vs company

Horses galloping

A horse requires being on flat ground for a chronic lameness, but his friends are in a large, hilly paddock and will disappear from his sight, this is a dilemma of the horse’s mental and physical health. Sometimes even the best plans are not so easy to implement. Should the other horses be confined closer (but it now reduces their feed/range, and increases the owner inputs), should a new friend be introduced (prehaps a goat or a pony – with its own set of dilemmas), should he instead have regular contact so as to appease his basic need, and if so is it enough? This is a difficult subject because for a horse, friendship appears to be a more pressing basic need than his physical health. He would rather (because evolution tells him to) be with the herd, even if it hurts and is ultimately to his detriment. Company is a more pressing need to a horse.

Rider needs vs horse needs – competition

Equitation jumping

Riders are trying to shape horses into things they were never bred to do, or have been bred to do – but the horse may not like his job. A horse, even if smartly bred, may have an accidental conformation that makes his job difficult or produces additional physical (or mental) stresses. For example: the too upright pastern in a jumper, too shorter neck in a dressage horse, predisposition to OCD. Sometimes horses are better matched to another ‘job’ than the one he was bred to do. He may be a terrific trail horse, he may be wonderful with kids, he may help rehabilitate people or other horses. Sometimes we have to be realistic about where in the natural life-cycle the horse sits – maybe he is not yet old enough to fulfil our desires, maybe now – purely as a factor of age, he can no longer be expected to the job he once loved or was skilled at. With age his job changes – when he is older, we cannot expect him to perform at the same level, but having kept him well-trained and of sound mind and body, he can be happy teaching a less confident rider in less demanding tasks, he may enjoy quiet hacking more, or a decreased workload, or even retirement. Typically competition riders at least have the finances to provide good feed, good therapists and good vets.

Financial considerations

The everyday dilemmas begin simply with the choice of where the horse is to live – and this is driven by individual financial considerations. Barns and grazing options can work out to be challenging to the budget, but they must also suit the horse. The best barn in the world is of no consequence if it stretches your finances to the point of not being able to pay for unexpected medical treatment or injury. These expenses need to be factored in before you even choose horse ownership. You need to factor in enough slack for the unexpected need for stabling for injury, for extra feed, for even a rise in feed prices during drought. These ensure the basic needs of the horse are met. If your horse gets an illness or a chronic injury, what is your plan, how will you cope?

Whilst on the subject of horse-keeping, expensive doesn’t necessarily mean appropriate to the horse’s needs – often making life easier for the owner than the horse, in a barn bringing confinement, less social interaction, with limited exercise, and more chance of developing stereotypies such as stall-walking, crib-biting, weaving.

Time

How much time do you need to have in a day to meet the horse’s daily needs and to undertake any training, or to meet your competition goals? How does this impact on your work, your family life and relationships? How does this impact your personal lifestyle balance? Does riding keep you sane, and therefore become a very important need to be personally fulfilled? If you have a young horse, or a more challenging horse – do you have the appropriate amount of time to give the horse that he will require? It may be a more difficult task for you if you work long hours, have to commute a long way to the horse, have a young family or a demanding job. Additionally, do you have the confidence and skills? Clinton Anderson got it right when he said that a horse is simply maintence on legs!

Breeding and unwanted horses

When and why do you choose to breed from your horse? There are many horses where a ‘back yard owner’ decides to breed from their mare – but sometimes it is to fulfil an owner want, rather than any sort of need. I have seen many situations where horses that should never have been bred from – poor conformation, unsuitability for the owner (who intends on keeping the foal), and here’s a prime one – the horse has behavioural problems… so what do you do… you guessed it… you breed from it! These sorts of owners lack the skill to handle a foal, typically lack suitable facilities, and lack the experience of running a broadmare. The foal is not going to have a good start… and may end up with health or behavioural issues, the first 18 months being so important to the social and physical development of a foal. These foals that do not have the opportunity to grow up in a herd environment, and with other foals, typically lack the learned social skills, important to him operating safely in a human world. These are the foals that become over familiar with humans (they have been overhandled, and under-disciplined for biting, kicking, pushing, even charging people and chasing them from the paddock). There are many horses that end up unloved, unwanted, that end up at the knacker’s yard, or are surrended to or saved by the brilliant equine welfare organisations, sanctuaries and individuals that have sadly become increasingly required because of humans making bad decisions.

Training method and coach selection

Hyperflexion

What training method suits the horse? What does the horse tell us? Listen to his subtle (and sometimes very unsubtle) signs. Constantly review and revisit evidence of these signs throughout your training and interaction with the horse. The fact is that whilst some competition-coaches place performance before welfare, there are others that have a better balance. Some of the best horse(wo)men never compete, but if a horse has a problem they are the first point of call. Why is this? This is because some of the training methods have become de-coupled from adequately addressing how the horse learns. There are some ‘cowboys’ who would not know what ‘habituation’ is, what ‘negative reinforcement’ is, but they sure know how to apply it – AND more importantly – the horse knows! Good training employs methods that whether you understand the terminology or not, lead to good horsemanship because of their
application of common principles. Sometimes trained ‘trainers’ become parrots of their mentor, rather than a thinking/evolving horseman in his/her own right. This too has happened many times, and is why I believe some end up moving away from doctrine-based training to something more holistic, open-minded and evolving.

Gear selection & use

Horse hell, show jumping

We are willingly being  sold: (a) unneccessary and even damaging equipment every day, (b) trendy equipment given the current fashion, (c) ill-fitting gear, either cheap or expensive… saddles, bridles etc, etc (d) good gear that is then ill-used – even a cavesson noseband can become a weapon if over-tightened. So… every time you put a piece of equipment anywhere near your horse, you have an ethical dilemma – in choice, fit ,quality and maintenance.

Horses unsuitable for rider

Oftentimes, people are drawn to horses (like partners) that are not what they need – they unknowingly sacrifice years of fun, safety and wonderful learning and growing opportunities for a horse that is beautiful, that is of a fancy or trendy breed, that is young,  ‘rescued’ or inexperienced. It all depends where you are at as a rider as to where your (rational) choice should lie. Be realistic, and go into a new relationship with a horse with eyes wide open. Once you own a horse, he becomes your biggest problem or your greatest joy – choose wisely. Like partners, people often repeat the same mistakes – and even go as far as replacing an unsuitable horse inadvertently with a replica of the former!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 3 comments }

It’s about time this blog had a spark of positivity – and here it is! Today I share with you the principles of permaculture and how they relate to horse training.

“What is permaculture?”

I hear you ask…

Permaculture is a way of providing sustainable food and shelter for people, whilst not harming the environment, the soil or the living organisms within that landscape. The 3 main ethics around which the principles revolve are: care of the earth, care of people and redistribution of surplus. Permaculture’s sustainable approach extends to animals too – their health and welfare, and for them to live a useful and pleasant life.

In reading about the ethics and design principles of permaculture, I am struck by the cross-over into horse training. Take a look at the principles following, but think instead about each regarding interaction with horses – I think your brain will start to spark in interesting ways!

Like 12 months of the year, there are 12 governing principles:

  1. Observe & interact
  2. Catch & store energy
  3. Obtain a yield
  4. Apply self regulation & accept feedback
  5. Use & value renewable resources & services
  6. Produce no waste
  7. Design from patterns to details
  8. Integrate rather than segregate
  9. Use small & slow solutions
  10. Use & value diversity
  11. Use edges & value the marginal
  12. Creatively use & respond to change

Your task for the day, is to sit quietly, preferably somewhere outside – such as in a field, on the beach, or under a tree, and contemplate these principles, then report back to me. If it helps, close your eyes, or walk around (preferably not at the same time, because you might walk onto the road, or into a tree…)

I would love to hear what you come up with.

Permaculture was invented by Bill Mollison and David Holmgren in Australia in the 1970s.

If you would like to find out about helping the earth through sustainable living, as well as your (hopefully)  sustainable riding, you can check out the following sites:

http://permacultureprinciples.com/ (they also do a wonderful diary, full of inspirational stories and growing tips)

www.holmgren.com.au – David Holmgren

www.tagari.com – Bill Mollison

I am currently reading Rosemary Morrow’s Earth User’s Guide to Permaculture, which I highly recommend as a very great introductory text with plenty of cute and informative illustrations by Rob Allsop.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 4 comments }

Equestrianism’s future

December 14, 2009

Tongue and hands - hyperflexion

How to use hyperflexion to gain compliance from your show jumper

Downhearted and disheartened with equestrianism, exasperated by recent competition world developments including Patrik Kittel’s ‘blue tongue’ incident, and then, shortly after declaring that they serve the welfare of the horse, equestrianism’s governing body – the FEI’s proposed acceptance of anti-inflammatory/pain relief medication “bute” – phenylbutazone – for competition.

It seems that when humans compete, the horses’ needs are subjugated for the egotistical drives of the human. The horses instead become a piece of sporting equipment on which to pursue personal recognition and possible fortune. The FEI, if they allow this change, is simply fuelling unacceptable levels of damage to horses.

The horse is not a willing partner choosing a competition or riding life, be it dressage, show jumping, eventing or racing. Nowhere else do we subject an animal to the same levels of distress – not even in greyhound racing, where the dogs once they are set free, can run at the pace of their choosing – they are not being kicked, held in, bounced on, suffering concussion on their joints from their heavy weight landing when jumping (and now on drugs with masking effects), suffering muscle and ligament tears, tongue damage, perhaps ill-fitting equipment, gadgets or simply bad riding. Even well-fitting equipment or riding bareback  restricts bloodflow, potentially compromising the back tissues in the horse.  Horses are ridden at times when – let’s be frank – it is not in their best interests.

I have to stand up for the interests of the ‘leisure’ rider here – so often they are made to feel as though they are some form of second class citizen because they choose not to compete. BUT from my observations they often hold their horses’ needs as superior to their own, perhaps in part because they do not have a deadline, because they cherish a relationship with their horse, and they are often keen observers of their horses’ health and behaviour.  This is a very wide statement, I know – as in all things individuals vary as to their position on ‘the bell shape’ curve, in all aspects – be it sporting, leisure or otherwise. My observations have been that even people who may ‘love’ their horse, can still administer a pain-killer, ignore a hint – or more – of lameness (and God only knows how the judges allow it) and take a horse to a competition when it is obviously lame.

I know wonderful people who have put their horse before their own desires – in recognising the need for better saddle fit, the need to get to the bottom of an unexplained behaviour change, or to rest the horse to allow him to grow. My hat goes off to them. Others may point the finger, feel a little more superior when they watch someone not able to ride for a while or working at the horse’s pace, but quietly achieving other(important) things – in groundwork, therapeutic techniques, learning the skills of assessment, observation and thought, reflecting and reading. In my book the rider doing what is right for his horse is the one who is correct. If I were a horse, I know which rider I would choose.

Many trainers make their money via the competition rider. After all, there is often rather a lot of money spent on flashly bred horses, expensive trucks, gear, travelling the country or world to shows – so these people demonstrate their ability and willingness to pay a trainer. A moral dilemma therefore ensues… or does it?

Well, it doesn’t for me. I will continue happy with assisting those who want to learn to work with the horse, and those who are not about to desert the message if the ego rears its ugly head or, in order to save time take shortcuts, happy with people not afraid to do things differently, who are humble and questioning in their approach.

I think it has proved time for a massive shake up in equestrianism, but I actually fear it is too late. I will not complain if competition is banned.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 6 comments }

Dressage Disgrace’s teleseminar with Klaus Hempfling on Rollkur was illuminating – it is important that we have these conversations, and I would like to thank Mark from Dressage Disgrace for making this conversation possible.

Photo courtesy of Klaus Hempfling (KFH Archives)

Photo courtesy of Klaus Hempfling (KFH Archives) http://www.hempfling.com/

What did Klaus say?

Klaus said that the dignity of the horse is lost, his sight is hampered and respiration is hindered when in Rollkur. He noted that if we were to beat a cat or dog, it would not be considered acceptable, but that hitting horses is perfectly legal in most countries.

The control of the horse’s neck has proven a very successful and speedy way to control a horse, and is also used a lot in show jumping; that this form of neck control is mostly used ‘without empathy’.

The majority of horses that are coming to Klaus are ‘depressed’. He thinks that it is a reflection of society and how humans have ‘lost themselves’.  He says that a second reason is that in horse whispering and dressage circles

the psychological level of the horse is being brought down, breaking the soul of the horse; there is no light, no magic in the horse; he has lost his dignity, is in permanent panic, and is scarred for life, because there is no way out

In some natural horsemanship practises he sees horses are ‘giving up’, as an antelope does to the lion in a predator/prey relationship when he can do no more to escape.

Sadly Klaus doesn’t have too much hope for horses that have been ridden using Rollkur. He says it is nearly impossible to restore the horse’s internal ‘fire’. Although recognising that he has a special gift, he says horses like this are

typically lost, they are half-killed

It may be possible to bring the life back to the horse, but it takes a lot of time; Klaus sometimes has to tell people that they should never ride their horse again, because the horse will ‘die again’ when the saddle goes on.

What are the alternatives?

Klaus advocates that we should open our eyes to see the reality, that indeed reality is more often not seen by those closest to the horse, but instead by the observers who may see it clearly.

Watch the world with your eyes, see the natural horse, and his typical balance – the balance is very different between native horse breeds such as the French Camargue or Haflinger with short, bulky necks and jaws, than the very different composition warmblood horses.

Go out and look at horses, he says – look at your horse, look at photos. The build of the horse dictates how the horse has evolved or been bred to ride; for example the Spanish horse needs the reins to feel that he hasn’t been deserted.  Klaus uses a cavesson halter, vibrating the rein softly, and with a loose contact, he says  ’the horse knows I am here’. Klaus says that to forget the reins (e.g. suggest the horse needs no reins at all) is quite wrong for some breeds, and that you must instead bring yourself to the suitable level to ride them.

Klaus himself uses two systems of riding – ‘natural riding’ (his favourite) on one style of horse – the stronger, more naturally evolved horse, but horses bred ‘with another set of skills’ with reins.

It is evident that Klaus has a true empathy of what it could be to be a horse, to respond to the world in the horse’s way, a view that challenges our anthropocentric view and leaves us feeling pretty uncomfortable. Like many uncomfortable experiences, it is a call to move to the next level of realisation and change.

www.DressageDisgrace.com has made the Hempfling Rollkur discussion available of this discussion.

To find out more about Klaus Hampfling’s work, go to www.hempfling.com

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Over on Twitter, TrotonTV (John Bethell) wanted my thoughts on Anky van Grunsven’s reply about her student Patrik Kittel’s  ‘Blue Tongue’ video recording, now being investigated by FEI. (I also wrote about it here).

140 tweet characters does not allow a particularly thorough reply!

So John, here you go…

Example of unknown dressage horse ridden in Rollkur (hyperflexion)

Example of unknown dressage horse ridden in Rollkur (hyperflexion)

We must use a degree of caution, knowing that the link is a translation (for those of us who don’t read Dutch!)  With anything translated, there is always a danger of the old problem of ‘meaning lost in translation’.

For the benefit of our discussion here, I am talking about the translation made by Google today, 15 November 2009.

  1. Anky appears to suggest that the horse’s tongue was over the bit. The question arises: ”is it OK for the horse to go with the tongue over the bit at all?; but also why would he want to put his tongue over the bit?
  2. Assuming Anky is right, and that the tongue was over the bit, the answer is: because of pressure on his tongue that he is trying to escape. A horse trying to escape tongue pressure retracts his tongue in his mouth, and can then get it ‘over the bit’.
  3. My thoughts are that if the tongue is blue: (a) it probably not simply over the bit, but is either trapped between the two bits, or under both bits, but with sufficient pressure to limit oxygenated blood supply to the tongue, making it appear blue (unoxygenated), OR (b) [and this is a very unqualified statement on my part, as I don't know of any studies that have addressed this] perhaps it possible that blue tongue is merely a symptom of lack of oxygenated blood to the horse’s whole head caused by overbent neck limiting oxygenated blood supply.
  4. I am not sure what ‘losrijterrein’ means. It is possible this means hyperflexion or Rollkur, but I do not know. If this does mean hyperflexion, I am not sure if she is saying that audiences either (a) are used to seeing hyperflexion, (b) regularly complain about it, or (c) are used to seeing it enough to think it normal.
  5. The translated reply says that horses ‘can put their tongues over the bit for any reason and that it need not be negative’ – perhaps something here is confused in translation, or maybe not. I don’t accept that a horse going with  tongue over the bit is acceptable, one wonders why this wasn’t this pointed out to the rider by officials.
  6. Anky recognises that the FEI has to uphold equine welfare, but thinks that the problem has been blown out of proportion and that they need to support riders also.

Personally, I am relieved this is getting attention at the FEI.

Somewhere I have read that Anky says the science does not show that hyperflexion is detrimental to the horse. She is right in this comment – studies of Rollkur  have been inconclusive, they are not easy undertaken, and indeed the science does not as yet point firmly in one direction. A recent report to the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality noted studies contained  flaws in methodology, limited numbers, or unhelpful parameters were used and that

This leads us to conclude there is insufficient scientific evidence to confirm unequivocally whether or not there are welfare issues involved in training techniques using hyperflexion’.

The case of hyperflexion and the blue tongue is perhaps a situation where rather than relying solely on the current scientific evidence, common sense should enable us to utilise our knowledge of biology, pain, biomechanics (and physics – e.g. the lever action of the curb), which is what I believe many educated people are trying to do.

You will see on the FEI website, their rules governing Abuse of Horses (Article 142, page 35) – specifically notes that no person may use actions ”causing pain or unnecessary discomfort to a horse’. Given what has been observed of recent times, these actions have not been held to account for years.

This raises the question: given the implications for the FEI and equestrian sport in general, is the FEI the appropriate body to conduct and impartial investigation into Patrik Kittel’s horse’s blue tongue? – or is it a case as Bidda Jones of the Australian RSPCA suggests ‘is the fox in the hen house’?

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 5 comments }