Posts tagged as:

Horsemanship

While we are teaching the horse, what is he teaching us?

Be still… Listen…

Did a ‘problem’ show up today?

What did you do?

Will you do less… more…?

Slow down. What is the horse saying?

Is the horse saying ‘I am confused’?

Is he saying ‘I need to survive’?

Is he saying ‘Your energy frightens me’?

Do less. Be still. Wait.

He has a right to feel the way he does.

Recognise the right thing when it shows up.

Humans are in a hurry to shape the world.

Reward by a release of the pressure – save your horse’s mental and physical health.

Trust and believe in yourself. You have a teacher right there in front of you. The horse did not start with an Olympic trainer, or with Tom Dorrance, he has read no books, has watched no videos. The only thing he knows is himself and his world.

Give the horse the gift of your attention and see inside him. Work with him where he’s at. It is the least we owe him, having taken away his freedom.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

Negative reinforcement gets a bad rap – after all, why would someone want to beat a horse? Why indeed! When asked about if they use negative reinforcement in their training, riders frequently assure one that they do not…  ‘no, I only use positive reinforcement’ comes the earnest reply.

But in fact, negative reinforcement is indeed the trainer’s friend, and has nothing to do with beating horses or performing any other dodgy activities.

But what does negative reinforcement actually mean?

Unlike the common misconception that it is something ‘bad’ – as humans, we tend to associate the word ‘negative’ to averse consequences, for example a sarcastic remark is ‘negative’, a fight is ‘negative’; but negative reinforcement in animal training is simply the removal of something that results in improved responding rates.

While this terminology originates in behavioural psychology, the meaning can be found in the Concise Oxford Dictionary [negative n. 2. negative quality, absence of something, negative v.t. neutralize (effect)].

To understand this negative reinforcement, we also probably need to know what ‘reinforcement’ means… the Concise says that to reinforce something means ‘to strengthen or support’, including in quantity, size, importance – so this suggests an impression of an increase in force or magnitude.

But The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology, written by Arthur and Emily Reber recognises use of the term also elicits confusion among psychologists. Is it any wonder we are confused?! The Rebers – after a useful diatribe exploring ‘reinforcement’ finally come up with

any event, stimulus, act, response or information when made contingent upon the response that preceded it, serves to increase the relative frequency or likelihood of occurrence of that response.

Simply put, negative involves removal or absence, and a reinforcer increases responses – Simple!

What does it mean to a horse-rider? No matter what anyone says, people ride using negative reinforcement. The stimulis (aids) are applied using a bridle, bit, halter, string around the neck and the legs on the horse’s sides. The removal of the bit pressure or the leg pressure removes discomfort and signals to the horse that his response was correct. The horse has no way of determining that his response is ‘correct’ if he is not rewarded by a removal of the stimulus when the response occurs.

All good horsemen (yes, women too) know this. The Dorrance brothers knew this, Philippe Karl knows this, Andrew McLean knows this, Steffen Peters knows this. The old masters knew this ‘leg without hand, hand without leg’. Gas pedal and brakes do not go on together.

Repeat after me…

‘correct use of negative reinforcement is a good thing’!

At the most subtle level (blink and you will miss it) the best proponents of the German system may recognise this, but that system is terrible at expressing it or teaching riders to ride using correct negative reinforcement, with confusion produced by statements such as ‘the horse must be through’, and be ridden ‘with the forward-driving aids into the hand’, undoubtedly leading to some of the abominations seen at all levels of the sport with horses suffering from relentless pressure.

Another day, we will explore positive reinforcement – also a good thing!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 6 comments }

Riding helmets make you stupid

December 24, 2009

[table id=4 /]
Helmetless horse-riding shows you are an inspired horse trainer, if Pat Parelli is to be believed.

The reason you do not see our people wearing helmets is because we try to teach people that rather than be brave because they are wearing a a helmet to protect them, they would be better off not riding until their horse is behaving safely.

If you have been around horses for longer than a nano-second, you realise that a horse is indeed a flight animal and that no horse is immune to slipping, stumbling, getting a fright, or some other mishap – NO MATTER HOW WELL TRAINED, as demonstrated in this video by Belle441 (via YouTube):

Horse falls – best to be wearing a hat

Of course training is important (and underestimated by many), but apparently common-sense is not always so common…

Perhaps the Parelli ‘preposterous position’ needs changing. Pop over to Kimberly Cox Carneal’s Enlightened Horsemanship blog for a letter and response from the Parelli organisation on helmet-use.

I don’t know about where you live – but here horse professionals pay a small fortune to be covered for horse-related accidents, yet one of the biggest suppliers of people to hospital wards is not the professional, but the amateur rider (who may have lower skills and experience), and who is easily influenced by a high-profile horse/rider trainer telling them they don’t need riding helmets.

Protect your most precious asset – wear a lid!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 11 comments }

via www.naturalhorsetrim.com, copied from the Columbus, Ohio Columbus Dispatch

via www.naturalhorsetrim.com, copied from the Columbus, Ohio 'Columbus Dispatch'

Recently, an interesting article written by an Australian gentleman by the name of John O’Leary was brought to my attention (thank-you Beks!).

Mr O’Leary has given horse transport and safety a lot of thought and provides a detailed account of how he thinks horses perceive their world and its impacts on their travelling problems.  To access this opinion-piece click on the link and check “I agree”. John O’Leary’s horsefloat dangers discusses the issues, along with pictures illustrating his concepts; there is no ‘beating about the bush’ here!

I have to say, this man has more good safety tips than you could shake a stick at!

The article link above  is off John O’Leary’s website. The following associated horse float dangers pics Mr O’Leary refers to are  from the Centaur Transport Logistics Horsefloat site. You owe it to your horses to check it out and make any changes you can.

Incidentally, the other horseman Mr O’Leary mentions at the start of the article is another Australian, John Chatterton, who designed the JR Easy Traveller (read the product profile, I couldn’t get the link to add here) - with unique flared walls that enable the horse to spread his legs, enabling improved balance.

JR Easy Traveller Horse Float with patented flared sides

[/caption]

Food for thought – and safe travelling.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Lessons in Lightness, the art of educating the horse by Mark Russell with Andrea W. Steele

'Lessons in Lightness, the art of educating the horse' by Mark Russell & Andrea W. Steele

I have been reading an excellent book by Mark Russell and Andrea Steele,  Lessons in Lightness – the art of educating the horse. Not only reading the book, but experimenting with my clients and their horses (with their permission, of course!). In this way I have been able to assess the ease of understanding and application of the concepts, to observe and experience the outcomes in a variety of horses, and to discuss the outcomes with the owners so as to gauge their feedback on whether they found the method valuable or otherwise.

First – a little background on Mark; Mark Russell trains horses and riders in Tennessee, U.S.A. Having trained Western performance horses and learnt to shoe, Mark was introduced to dressage by way of a fortuitous clinic given by the Portuguese Master, Nuno Oliveira who was touring the United States at the time, a clinic that changed Mark’s approach forever:

the moment I saw Master Oliveira ride, I knew the secret that had eluded me was right before my eyes. I saw not only lightness, balance, and harmony,but a horse that was happy and proud in his work. Oliveira’s humanity spoke to me through the movement of his horse – this was my revelation.

A personal study of ‘the old masters’ ensued, and this is where I find this book a revelation – Mark discusses and demonstrates exercises that integrates Frenchman Baucher’s principles in such a way that it is readily accessible to readers.

In a philosophy reminiscent of the French tradition, the horse is relaxed from the front – releasing first the jaw, then the poll and in turn eliminating tension from his body to allow him to carry himself and give freely to the aids.

The work begins in hand, with lateral poll flexion and the horse is allowed to stretch forward and down toward the ground. It is only when balance is achieved, that more is asked of the horse – including higher gaits. Well-drawn and labelled diagrams of the horse’s anatomy help illuminate the concepts.

Lessons in Lightness lives up to its promise; you are treated to pictures of horses in softness, not tension, clear diagrams and photographs showing Mark and his horses performing exercises in English and Western attire, and to clear, concise lessons aided by thoughtful discussion of the principles behind.

You are guided through teaching lightness; working in hand (including shoulders in, counter shoulders in and half pass), and 3 phases of ridden work, moving through beginning on the circle, building a working frame, to lateral work under saddle (shoulders-in, counter-shoulders-in, half pass, travers, renvers), the canter, then to counter-canter and flying changes.

There are a couple of items of tack used where I would exercise caution – from a learning theory perspective. When lunging, sidereins are attached to the horse’s bit and hence his mouth; although popular in many systems, this can confuse the horse in his responses to rein signals – i.e. ’round’ versus ’slow’ or ’stop’. [Philippe Karl, former ecuyer of the French Cadre Noir is not a fan of side-reins either - he does not like the constriction they place on the horse. Sidereins remain a part of the German system and others, however]. Reins attached to the horse’s bit issue a signal that should result in a response from the horse’s legs, rather than a head-set. Mark uses an overcheck system at the same time (rather like a chambon) which may not be a problem if adjusted appropriately (i.e. if the horse is not unnecessarily shortened in the neck or encouraged to go behind the vertical, or to round further down the neck than the poll – for example at the C3). This piece of equipment applies poll pressure only if the head is raised, so is not de-training responses to the rein and therefore does not appear to violate the principles of  negative reinforcement to the rein – in that the poll pressure is released/removed when the horse lowers his head – and thereby is able to solve the problem of pressure with a consistent answer. (Beware if using such an item that some horses may react adversely, if they have not been taught to lower from poll pressure previously, so it does need careful introduction). Mark uses this lunging system so as to ensure the horse ‘is not put on his shoulders by an excessively low head carriage’.

For the same reasons of potential confusion over rein signals, my second caution is in the use of draw (or running) reins, which Mark only uses for horses that have trouble releasing at the poll – and they are only used in conjunction with his normal snaffle reins. You can find out more about draw reins and the biomechanics involved in Tug of War: classical versus “modern” dressage by Dr Gerd Heuschmann.

That said, I feel that the people attracted to this book will have no trouble avoiding inappropriate use of the fore-mentioned tack. Any issue I have with these pieces of equipment (if you consider them in the light of my discussion) is more than adequately made up for in the message, the lessons and the underlying principles described by this wonderful modern work.

As for my clients and their horses, they have achieved very positive results, achieving a new found relaxation that allows improved submission to the slightest aids. Personally, I have experienced what I can only describe as true ‘riding meditation’, and a horse that will softly travel in any direction with light pressure – as though moving soft butter!

I can only hope that Mark will soon be sharing with us an additional text, and meanwhile I understand DVDs are currently in production.

The value of the book, especially in the light of what one typically sees in the modern dressage arena, is immense – I advise you to personally determine what is ethically appropriate for the horse and let that guide you as to what and how you use training methods and tack; to explore and question what you are told by your instructors, what you have read, what you see at all levels (including at the local barn or shows, and Olympic and World level) – and to be your own judge for your horse’s sake.

I think your horse will thank you for reading (and applying) this book – don’t let it sit on the shelf – thumb through it, underline it and refer to it often.

I whole-heartedly recommend Mark Russell’s ‘Lessons in Lightness, the art of educating the horse’. If I had a star rating system, it would achieve 5 stars!

Disclosure: My paperback copy of ‘Lessons in Lightness – the art of educating the horse’ was kindly provided to me by Hela Russell for review.  My review is given freely, without favour or prejudice.

I am happy to provide this link  where you can find out more about Natural Dressage: Mark Russell’s clinics and training.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 3 comments }